badpsychics.co.uk Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the badpsychics.co.uk

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host badpsychics.co.uk. Currently, hosted in United Kingdom and its service provider is Webfusion Internet Solutions .

amazon.co.uk 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called GSE containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

the award winning, as seen on tv - badpsychics, exposing fake psychics, mediums and the paranormal since 2003. pages home shop forum contact badpsychics most haunted sponsors/affiliates the big badpsychics list links 31 august 2018 how can you trust the media when they trust mediums | tyler henry & theresa caputo by anthony galli i find it interesting how there are still a lot of people out there who will watch a news story and think, "yep that's true" without ever questioning the facts, biases, or incentives of the speaker. but ultimately how can we put our trust in a media that puts its trust in mediums? posted by jon donnis at 08:32 no comments: 12 august 2018 repost: an analysis of psychic / medium charlie kelly. could it get any worse? yes, yes it could - part 2 first of all if you have not read part 1 of my charlie kelly analysis please do so before going any further, you can read it by clicking here if you recall, a lady by the name of cathy, who is the owner of the "light afterlife" spiritual forum, told me she had received a reading from a medium by the name of charlie kelly, and that it had convinced her, that he had told her things he had no possible way of knowing, you know the classic stuff believers say when waxing lyrical about a medium who has convinced them. so me being me i decided to expose charlie kelly, show the world his clever methods of manipulation, and how he didn't really communicate with the dead, but instead used known and replicable psychological trickery to fool people. now considering that cathy herself claims magical powers, i was desperate to show her how wrong she could be, but i also suspected that she would not mention his name in my vicinity unless he was really good, so i puffed out my chest, and got ready for a big challenge. i managed to find an unedited raw recording of charlie performing readings at healing hearts centre in essex in 2016. this was perfect. i had the recording, i got someone to transcribe the 65 minute piece for me, and off i could go. little did i know that charlie kelly would be the single worst, most useless excuse for a psychic medium i had ever seen, hear or read. just consider that for a moment, i have been exposing psychics/mediums for over 13 years, and he is the worst, of the thousands of readings i have analysed, he has the least ability. i wanted some super smart braniac psychic medium who would test every ounce of my knowledge on the subject and instead if got zippy off of rainbow throwing out things like this. "...so this was my first one but i bottled it, so is there anybody in the room that would have lost someone through something like a natural disaster, or the tsunami or something like that? i am very aware of this natural disaster feel to it. come on, where are you? no. no loose connection there because i feel like i need to talk about a couple who that would have passed in that way, no, not to worry i’ll bench it for now. oh i can't, sort of half towards the back there, no-one there, no-one understand this, not to worry i’ll leave it for a moment...." that was the highlight of the first article! anyway i posted the first article and i admitted that i got the analysis short as it was so bad, so tedious, but that i would try to finish it off if i ever got chance. now cards on the table time, i had no interest in really finishing it off, it was so bad, that it was painful for me to write about, so i thought i would give charlie kelly a kinda pass, i would let the article float on the site, and forget about it. afterall he is a small time, no name psychic, who has never really done anything with his life, not really very good at his job, and only the incredibly gullible or desperate will be falling for his act, he wont be making much money. so what the hell, the first article will forever be online and does its job in highlighting how terrible he is. and the best thing about this site is that it has great google ranking, so anyone searching for his name will see this site within the first few results, usually just after charlie kelly's own official website and his facebook page. but then cathy, the aforementioned owner of the "light afterlife" spiritual forum emailed me regarding a different topic, i helped he best i could as i always do, and also asked her if she had read my article on charlie, since i had not seen or heard any reaction from her. she then accused me of "cherry picking" and "conveniently" only analysing half of the recording, as if i had somehow masterminded a plot to ignore his amazing abilities, and bury his talents behind misrepresentations and lies! clearly she missed the fact that i posted a full transcript of what i did analyse, as well as include the raw recording of the entire event! unedited for anyone to listen to and make their own mind up! do you know i did not have one single complaint about the article, no one, not even charlie kelly himself complained. no solicitor contacted me accusing me of libel, no one offered any alternative opinion, or said i had mis-transcribed any part of the reading, nothing! so i was a little surprised by cathy saying that, but then it occured to me, she never really read any of the article, she was just attacking me because that is what she does. she makes a claim, i expose it as bogus, she attacks me and calls me names. so where does that leave things? well it leaves me with 30 odd minutes of readings to expose, so coffee ready, paracetamol taken, lets get on with finishing it, oh and if any part of it is mis-transcribed, if i miss anything, if i misrepresent anything, if a single part of anything i say is wrong, then tell me, post in the comments, tweet me @jondonnis, make a fuss out of it! but if everything i say is right, well we know what happens. bury your head in the sand. download unedited raw recording from dropbox - by clicking here please note for some reason when i first tried to downloaded it, it made my computer freeze, not sure why, so if you do click to download, please be aware of that, and just be patient and it will work eventually. key: charlie kelly - in bold font member of the audience/client - in regular font me (jon donnis) - in red font so, i'm going to have to come to you, i need to get rid of this, i really need to get rid of it so the boy that drowned in thailand you say ( yes ) yo​u would understand that there would be, was is he living there? i feel like something is going on there so it's more than a holiday. ( yes ) ​and i know that the lad in question is of an adventurous nature so a little bit of a jack the lad i want to say? he was very talkative. first of all, what horrible verbiage to use when talking about dead children. "i need to get rid of this". charlie these are peoples lives you are talking about, not some lost fluffy slippers under the sofa! regarding the boy that drowned in thailand, see part 1 of this for where this was brought up. as a reminder, he had talked about the tsunami in indonesia, and one of the people in the crowd told charlie that their son's friend had died in thailand, so keep in mind that they told charlie about a dead person not the other way around. this is why sometimes a medium will get some information and then come back to it later in the evening, by doing this the people present will forget who said what and then just assume and recall after the fact that it was charlie who said a boy had died in thailand in the sea, when the truth is the opposite. to see i am telling the truth, go back to the first article by clicking here and search the page for the word "thailand" you will find 6 results, you can see for yourself who said what and to whom. also note that charlie above clearly says a "boy", where as the woman originally said her son's friend. now the reason for this is because charlie is confusing her with someone else who had also mentioned that their thai friend had a relative who had died there. clearly this woman's son's friend will not

URL analysis for badpsychics.co.uk

http://www.badpsychics.com/2015_06_07_archive.html
http://www.badpsychics.com/2010_09_05_archive.html
http://www.badpsychics.com/2015_10_04_archive.html
http://www.badpsychics.com/2016_03_06_archive.html
http://www.badpsychics.com/2014_09_07_archive.html
http://www.badpsychics.com/2015_03_01_archive.html
http://www.badpsychics.com/2017_08_27_archive.html
http://www.badpsychics.com/2007_05_13_archive.html
http://www.badpsychics.com/2018/
http://www.badpsychics.com/2007_02_04_archive.html
http://www.badpsychics.com/2015_10_11_archive.html
http://www.badpsychics.com/2017/08/badpsychics-classic-analysis-of-gordon.html
http://www.badpsychics.com/2014_07_27_archive.html
http://www.badpsychics.com/2005_08_21_archive.html
http://www.badpsychics.com/p/most-haunted.html
jonn.co.uk
pregnancyforum.co.uk
jondonnis.co.uk
amazon.co.uk
mastersofhorror.co.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain name:
badpsychics.co.uk

Data validation:
Nominet was able to match the registrant's name and address against a 3rd party data source on 28-Sep-2017

Registrar:
123-Reg Limited t/a 123-reg [Tag = 123-REG]
URL: http://www.123-reg.co.uk

Relevant dates:
Registered on: 08-Jul-2004
Expiry date: 08-Jul-2019
Last updated: 01-Jul-2018

Registration status:
Registered until expiry date.

Name servers:
ns.123-reg.co.uk 212.67.202.2
ns2.123-reg.co.uk 62.138.132.21

WHOIS lookup made at 19:18:10 10-Sep-2018

--
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:

Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2018.

You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at https://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REFERRER http://www.nominet.org.uk

  REGISTRAR Nominet UK

SERVERS

  SERVER co.uk.whois-servers.net

  ARGS badpsychics.co.uk

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

SPONSOR
123-Reg Limited t/a 123-reg [Tag = 123-REG]
URL: http://www.123-reg.co.uk
Relevant dates:

  CREATED 08-Jul-2004

  CHANGED 01-Jul-2018

STATUS
Registered until expiry date.

NSERVER

  NS.123-REG.CO.UK 212.67.202.2

  NS2.123-REG.CO.UK 62.138.132.21

  NAME badpsychics.co.uk

DISCLAIMER
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:
Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2018.
You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at https://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REGISTERED no

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .